Skip to main content

What are some important details from Mayella Ewell's testimony under Mr. Finch's questioning in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Uneducated and coerced into lying by her disreputable father, Mayella gives testimony that is so unsustainable that Atticus easily challenges its credibility.

While Mayella is on the witness stand, Atticus begins by asking her if the day of the alleged rape was the first time Tom had ever been inside the fence of her yard, and she replies "yes." Her answer raises some doubt, of course, because within the setting of the Jim Crow South, it would have been outrageously bold for a black man to have dared to commit rape without having had some prior close contact with a white woman. 


When Atticus asks Mayella what occurred, she hesitates. So, he asks her specifically if she recalls Tom's having beaten her about the face. She replies,


  • "No, I don't recollect if he hit me. I mean yes I do, he hit me."

Atticus asks her to verify her last statement:


  • "Huh? Yes, he hit--I just don't remember, I just don't remember...it all happened so quick."

Then, she oddly accuses Atticus of mocking her. Subsequently, Atticus has Tom stand up as he asks Mayella if Tom is the man who raped her. Mayella responds with confidence:


  • It most certainly is." (This answer is in contrast to her previous answer that is uncertain.)

Next, Atticus asks Mayella "How?" and she rages,


  • "I don't know how he done it, but he done it--I said it all happened so fast I--" (Again Mayella acts as though she does not remember. Her vagueness is questionable.)

Atticus, then, reviews for Mayella what she has said so far, and asks, "He choked you then?" and she replies, "Yes." Further, Atticus asks, "He blackened your left eye with his right fist?"


  • "I ducked and it--it glanced that's what it did...." (Significantly, Mayella does not deny that Tom used his right arm.)

Atticus continues his questioning, asking if Tom choked her, hit her, and raped her. Now, it seems that Mayella is sure: 


  • "It most certainly is."

Atticus asked her if she fought Tom and screamed, and Mayells says that she did. When Atticus asks her why none of her seven brothers and sisters responded, there is no answer. "Where were they?" Atticus asks. Again, there is no answer from Mayella.


Continuing this questioning, Atticus asks, "Why didn't your screams make them coming running? The dump's closer than the woods, isn't it?" Still there is no answer from Mayella.
He gets the same "no answer" when asking Mayella if she did not scream until she saw her father. Then, he asks,



"Did you scream first at your father instead of at Tom Robinson? Was that it?"
No answer.


"Why didn't you tell the truth, child, didn't Bob Ewell beat you up?"



Still Mayella does not answer. After Atticus turns his back, Mayella blurts out in rage that she "got somethin' to say" and she emotionally attacks the "fancy gentlemen" in the jury and Atticus with his "fancy airs." Here Mayella tries to reduce the questioning of Atticus to a simple belittlement of her just because she is poor. As she leaves the stand, Mayella glares with hatred at Atticus.

Labels

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Explain and discuss how the definitions of freedom change for the nation, for the freedmen and for southern whites after the Civil War.

After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to... After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to belong to without being ordered to attend religious services (or not to attend) by their mast...
Post a Comment
Read more