Skip to main content

In The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, what does money symbolize?

In this novel, acquiring money seems to be just about everyone's goal, but it ultimately fails to make even those who have it happy.  Gatsby desperately wants to amass a large fortune to win Daisy's heart back; however, when she learns how he has acquired this fortune, she quickly and selfishly abandons him and returns to her awful husband -- a man whose money is "old" and therefore more valuable, reliable, and indicative of status....

In this novel, acquiring money seems to be just about everyone's goal, but it ultimately fails to make even those who have it happy.  Gatsby desperately wants to amass a large fortune to win Daisy's heart back; however, when she learns how he has acquired this fortune, she quickly and selfishly abandons him and returns to her awful husband -- a man whose money is "old" and therefore more valuable, reliable, and indicative of status.  Gatsby's money doesn't make him happy.  Myrtle and George Wilson both try to acquire more wealth in different ways, but neither of them is made happy by their efforts.  Myrtle can never replace Daisy, and George can never seem to catch a break, no matter how hard he works.  It is not coincidence that all three of these characters, those who try to achieve the American Dream, end up dead.  Tom and Daisy Buchanan, on the other hand, are incredibly wealthy, but they aren't happy: Tom has been unfaithful to Daisy since before they even tied the knot, and Daisy now finds Tom "disgusting" and cheats on him with Gatsby.  Money certainly is not enough to make one happy, although not having enough of it can certainly make one miserable.


Furthermore, it becomes clear that money cannot buy love, but it can purchase privilege and status, and these are worth a great deal.  Daisy and Tom do not seem to be in love with each other by the end of the book; if he truly loved her, one might argue, he wouldn't continue to hurt and humiliate her by taking mistresses, and she can only say that she "loved him once," the implication being that she no longer does.  Therefore, these two stay together because they both enjoy the privilege their money gives them, the status it affords them.  They can afford to be selfish and "careless," as Nick describes them.  Their wealth gives them license to be horrible people, and it entitles them to get away with it.


Therefore, money has many different associations.  "Old money" confers status and privilege while "new money" confers only the ability to acquire.  The discrepancy between one's bank account and one's happiness and/or prosperity, or between one's work ethic and one's bank account, helps to convey the idea that the American Dream is a fallacy, that a man might acquire wealth, but he can never really change his status.  Several characters believe that money symbolizes happiness, but this turns out to be untrue as well.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more