Skip to main content

Was the Afghanistan War a just war? How did the leaders justify it to their people and to the international community? What were the aims of this war?

First, we need to get a clear meaning of "Afghanistan War" and "just war."  I am going to assume you mean the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in November 2001 after the attacks of 9/11.  By just war, you mean that the reason for going to war was just and the actions taken during that war were proportional to the attack of 9/11.  I will say "yes" to both counts.  The United States was attacked by...

First, we need to get a clear meaning of "Afghanistan War" and "just war."  I am going to assume you mean the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in November 2001 after the attacks of 9/11.  By just war, you mean that the reason for going to war was just and the actions taken during that war were proportional to the attack of 9/11.  I will say "yes" to both counts.  The United States was attacked by a non-state actor in Al-Qaeda which was primarily headquartered in Afghanistan.  Afghanistan was a terrorist state that really had no stable government to speak of after the Soviet-led invasion weakened the government there and opened the door to anti-Western extremists taking over.  America wanted to wipe out the terror leaders Osama bin-Laden and his top lieutenants.  It was necessary to overthrow the government there as this government was aiding and abetting these leaders.  While some of the actions taken during the war have been controversial, such as drone strikes killing civilians, it is impossible to absolutely eliminate all risk to civilians in time of war. America has taken great pains by not turning the war into a war against the people but rather as a manhunt and an attempt at promoting a stable regime in the region so this does not happen again.  While its actions in the region make the Afghanistan War appear to be a long-term project, its actions have been justified by the attack on American soil.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...

In Martel's Life of Pi, how does writing a diary help Pi Patel build on his leadership skills?

At the end of chapter 73, Pi first divulges the fact that he had started a diary after about a week alone at sea. Pi claims that he wrote about "practical stuff" (208) such as what he caught for food, foreseeable problems and solutions, Richard Parker, and reflections about specific events that occurred. In a sense, Pi is the captain of his ship; therefore, he must take responsibility for himself and his crew. He can... At the end of chapter 73, Pi first divulges the fact that he had started a diary after about a week alone at sea. Pi claims that he wrote about "practical stuff" (208) such as what he caught for food, foreseeable problems and solutions, Richard Parker, and reflections about specific events that occurred. In a sense, Pi is the captain of his ship; therefore, he must take responsibility for himself and his crew. He can do this by writing down events, problems and solutions, and reflections to look back on when confronted with repeated problems. It can ...

Why did Tybalt attack and kill Mercutio instead of Romeo, who he had originally been targeting?

Though Tybalt's quarrel is with Romeo, he begins the momentous duel in Act 3 by fighting with and killing Mercutio instead. Tybalt ultimately attacks Mercutio because the garrulous and hot-headed character insults Tybalt and goads him into a duel to protect Romeo's honor. From the beginning of the encounter in Act 3, Scene 1, it's clear that Mercutio is itching for a fight. For instance, when Tybalt signals that he wants to talk to Mercutio... Though Tybalt's quarrel is with Romeo, he begins the momentous duel in Act 3 by fighting with and killing Mercutio instead. Tybalt ultimately attacks Mercutio because the garrulous and hot-headed character insults Tybalt and goads him into a duel to protect Romeo's honor. From the beginning of the encounter in Act 3, Scene 1, it's clear that Mercutio is itching for a fight. For instance, when Tybalt signals that he wants to talk to Mercutio and Benvolio, Mercutio responds "And but one word with one of us?/ Couple it w...