Skip to main content

Was the Afghanistan War a just war? How did the leaders justify it to their people and to the international community? What were the aims of this war?

First, we need to get a clear meaning of "Afghanistan War" and "just war."  I am going to assume you mean the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in November 2001 after the attacks of 9/11.  By just war, you mean that the reason for going to war was just and the actions taken during that war were proportional to the attack of 9/11.  I will say "yes" to both counts.  The United States was attacked by...

First, we need to get a clear meaning of "Afghanistan War" and "just war."  I am going to assume you mean the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in November 2001 after the attacks of 9/11.  By just war, you mean that the reason for going to war was just and the actions taken during that war were proportional to the attack of 9/11.  I will say "yes" to both counts.  The United States was attacked by a non-state actor in Al-Qaeda which was primarily headquartered in Afghanistan.  Afghanistan was a terrorist state that really had no stable government to speak of after the Soviet-led invasion weakened the government there and opened the door to anti-Western extremists taking over.  America wanted to wipe out the terror leaders Osama bin-Laden and his top lieutenants.  It was necessary to overthrow the government there as this government was aiding and abetting these leaders.  While some of the actions taken during the war have been controversial, such as drone strikes killing civilians, it is impossible to absolutely eliminate all risk to civilians in time of war. America has taken great pains by not turning the war into a war against the people but rather as a manhunt and an attempt at promoting a stable regime in the region so this does not happen again.  While its actions in the region make the Afghanistan War appear to be a long-term project, its actions have been justified by the attack on American soil.   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more