Skip to main content

Was Julius Caesar an astute politician, a military genius, a scheming opportunist, a visionary or a combination of all these ?

Based on the vast amount of research done on Caesar’s life and legacy and the variety of scholarly perspectives that have emerged, it is safe to say that he was an astute politician, a military genius, a scheming opportunist, AND a visionary.


Caesar was able to gain much of his initial power because of his familial ties to the prestigious Julian clan. He climbed the political ladder from quaestor, to aedile, to praetor, to provincial...

Based on the vast amount of research done on Caesar’s life and legacy and the variety of scholarly perspectives that have emerged, it is safe to say that he was an astute politician, a military genius, a scheming opportunist, AND a visionary.


Caesar was able to gain much of his initial power because of his familial ties to the prestigious Julian clan. He climbed the political ladder from quaestor, to aedile, to praetor, to provincial governor, to consul, and eventually to ultimate dictator of Rome. His path to power was remarkably intuitive, which is indicative of an astute politician.


Scholars widely agree that Caesar was one of the greatest military geniuses of all time. Aside from his massive success during his time in Gaul, he was also successful in ending the Great Roman Civil War (49-45 BCE)—one of many conflicts that foreshadowed the end of the Republican political system. After the war, Caesar reached his peak in political power as Perpetual Dictator (Latin: Dictator perpetuo). Before this, dictatorship was only meant to be a temporary governing solution in times of crisis. But Caesar’s influence was so profound at this point that he was able to maintain that title for the rest of his life. This paved the way for the establishment of the Empire.


Needless to say, Caesar’s rise to power was fraught with controversy. Many other politicians perceived him as a scheming opportunist who disrespected the traditional political system by altering it to suit his own agenda—which ultimately led to his assassination.


Be that as it may, Caesar’s opportunism did not undermine him as a visionary. He knew Rome was in desperate need of debt relief and reform, and he took whatever measures necessary to make those improvements. He was widely loved by the Roman people, especially those from the lower and middle classes who directly benefitted from his influence. In addition, Caesar was the first Roman figure to be deified, which indicates how profound his leadership was!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more