Skip to main content

What was the greatness of the Roman Empire based on?

If greatness can be defined as power, the Roman Empire can certainly be termed great. With its beginning as an average city-state on the Italian peninsula, Rome grew to be the most powerful empire in the ancient world, far eclipsing the Persian and Greek empires that preceded it, among others.


As the city of Rome began to grow in strength and population, it organized itself politically as a Republic, the form of government it perpetuated for...

If greatness can be defined as power, the Roman Empire can certainly be termed great. With its beginning as an average city-state on the Italian peninsula, Rome grew to be the most powerful empire in the ancient world, far eclipsing the Persian and Greek empires that preceded it, among others.


As the city of Rome began to grow in strength and population, it organized itself politically as a Republic, the form of government it perpetuated for approximately 500 years. Even as a Republic, the city of Rome expanded from its location along the Tiber River in the central-western part of the Italian peninsula to conquer and colonize the tribes and towns throughout Italy. Ultimately, Rome's imperial expansion led it to conquer around 20% of the world's known population, with the full extent of its empire reaching a climax around 117 A.D., during the reign of the emperor Trajan.


While conquered people naturally chafed under foreign rule, the first two centuries of imperial rule, after the demise of the Republic, is often called the Pax Romana by historians, a period marked by fairly widespread peace and prosperity. Rome's magnanimous approach to most of the people they conquered was to customarily integrate subject people into the Empire, assuring them the protection of Roman military might and participation in Rome's far-flung economy, laws and customs.


Roman laws were quite sophisticated and forward-looking for their day, and freed many conquered people from centuries of superstition and their attendant crude legal systems. In fact, many laws employed in the modern Western canon can be traced to Roman legal history.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more