Skip to main content

Why was Johnson put through the impeachment process? Did it work?

Technically, Andrew Johnson was impeached for violating the Tenure of Office Act, a measure passed by congressional Republicans that forced the President to consult the Senate before firing Cabinet officials. Johnson removed his political rival, Secretary of War Edwin Stanton from office in defiance of this law, and was duly impeached by Radical Republicans in the House of Representatives. As with most struggles between the President and Congress, the motives for impeachment went deeper. Johnson...

Technically, Andrew Johnson was impeached for violating the Tenure of Office Act, a measure passed by congressional Republicans that forced the President to consult the Senate before firing Cabinet officials. Johnson removed his political rival, Secretary of War Edwin Stanton from office in defiance of this law, and was duly impeached by Radical Republicans in the House of Representatives. As with most struggles between the President and Congress, the motives for impeachment went deeper. Johnson had consistently opposed the Reconstruction measures of House Republicans, vetoing the Civil Rights Act of 1866 as well as the Freedmen's Bureau, both of which were intended to protect the rights of black men and women in the South. So impeachment was a political move. Whether it "worked" or not largely depends on an understanding of how impeachment works. "Impeachment" is often used in popular discourse to mean the removal of the President. But in reality, impeachment is only the act of bringing charges against the President. This must be done by a majority of the House, as it was (by a very large majority) against Johnson. However, only the Senate, essentially acting as a jury, may actually remove a President, which can only be done by a two-thirds vote. After a very long deliberation, the Senate fell one vote short of the two-thirds vote needed for removal, so efforts to remove Johnson were not successful. But the very act of bringing charges against Johnson weakened the President, and he was able to stay in office only because he agreed in principle not to oppose the Reconstruction initiatives of his Radical Republican rivals. So the impeachment of Johnson ended up being a successful political gambit on their part.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are the cobra's physical features in Rikki-Tikki-Tavi?

There are two cobras that Rikki-tikki faces off against.  Nag is the male cobra and Nagaina is the female cobra.  The first snake that Rikki-tikki sees is Nag, and he is a rather imposing figure. Then inch by inch out of the grass rose up the head and spread hood of Nag, the big black cobra, and he was five feet long from tongue to tail. … he looked at Rikki-tikki with the wicked snake's eyes that never change their expression, whatever the snake may be thinking of. Nag raises himself up and shows off his great hood.  On his hood there is a “spectacle-mark on the back of it that looks exactly like the eye part of a hook-and-eye fastening.”  Rikki-tikki is only intimidated for a moment, and is not tricked when Nagaina tries to come up behind him. Nag and Nagaina know that a mongoose is very bad news for them.  As the new house mongoose, it is Rikki-tikki’s job to kill all of the snakes.  The cobras would definitely be on his hit-list, and this worries them because they have a family...

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...