Skip to main content

What was the U.S. foreign policy before the bombing of Pearl Harbor?

The foreign policy of the United States was evolving when Pearl Harbor was attacked in December 1941. For most of the 1930s, the United States followed a policy of neutrality. Our neutrality laws prohibited us from selling war materials to countries that were at war. This included countries fighting in a civil war. The Neutrality Act of 1937 said we could sell nonmilitary materials to a country at war only on a cash and carry...

The foreign policy of the United States was evolving when Pearl Harbor was attacked in December 1941. For most of the 1930s, the United States followed a policy of neutrality. Our neutrality laws prohibited us from selling war materials to countries that were at war. This included countries fighting in a civil war. The Neutrality Act of 1937 said we could sell nonmilitary materials to a country at war only on a cash and carry basis. They would have to pay cash for the materials and transport the products on their ships. Americans were weary of war. The Nye Committee suggested one reason why we entered World War I was for businesses to make money. This report didn’t make people too happy. Americans also were in the middle of dealing with the Great Depression and had little interest in what was happening in the world.


As we approached the end of the 1930s and the beginning of the 1940s, our policies were beginning to change. We realized the dangers that existed as a result of the aggressive actions of Germany, Japan, and Italy. The Neutrality Act of 1939 allowed us to sell war materials to a country at war on a cash and carry basis. We developed the Destroyers for Bases program to help Great Britain get destroyers. The Lend-Lease Act was passed to help Great Britain get needed supplies. We created a hemispheric defense zone to allow us to patrol the Atlantic and to help the British locate German submarines. The Export Control Act allowed us to stop selling strategic materials to a country like Japan that was using these materials for military purposes. We also froze Japan’s financial assets in our banks.


By the time we were attacked at Pearl Harbor, we were neutral in name only. We were actively helping the British against Germany and Italy, and we were trying to slow the Japanese advances in Asia and in the Pacific Ocean.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...
Post a Comment
Read more