Skip to main content

Why do you think Shakespeare has Macbeth stand alone on stage when he speaks about what he can see?

Of the three scenes in which Macbeth sees apparitions or hallucinations, he's actually only alone on stage in one of them. When he's visited by the bloodied corpse of Banquo at the banquet, he is accompanied by his wife and several lords. In Act IV, the witches share the stage with him as he receives the series of visions and prophecies which guide his actions through the remainder of the play. So I assume you're...

Of the three scenes in which Macbeth sees apparitions or hallucinations, he's actually only alone on stage in one of them. When he's visited by the bloodied corpse of Banquo at the banquet, he is accompanied by his wife and several lords. In Act IV, the witches share the stage with him as he receives the series of visions and prophecies which guide his actions through the remainder of the play. So I assume you're referring to his hallucination of the "air-drawn dagger" shortly before the murder of Duncan. Perhaps the most straightforward reason for why Macbeth receives this portent alone is to create a degree of ambiguity as to whether the dagger is a "false creation," an illusion emanating from Macbeth's own mind and desires, or a genuine supernatural manifestation. This in turn reflects one of the play's largest thematic questions, which is the uncertain relationship between human will and predestination, unknown and possibly malevolent forces which guide our actions and fates. We know that supernatural phenomena occur in this play, because the witches' prophecies are accurate (though deliberately misleading), but we also see that apparently paranormal happenings (like the march of Birnam wood toward Dunsinane) can have more rational explanations. We're also given reason to believe that Macbeth suffers from some non-specific neurological affliction which causes visual and auditory hallucinations; upon his rapt reaction to the ghost of Banquo, Lady Macbeth anxiously tells the guests "my lord is often thus, and hath been since his youth... the fit is momentary." She could arguably be lying about his medical history, of course, but it tracks with what Shakespeare has shown us, since Macbeth has had two prior hallucinations in the play, immediately before Duncan's death (the dagger) and immediately after (when he hears a disembodied voice cry "Sleep no more!").


So by placing Macbeth alone on stage when he sees the bloody dagger pointing his path to Duncan, Shakespeare achieves several functions at once. By creating an atmosphere of ambiguity about the objective reality of this uncanny event, he presents a visual metaphor for the play's central, haunting question, regarding Macbeth's degree of control over his own actions. He also preserves for later (the banquet scene) the spectacle of Macbeth terrified by a vision that no one else can see. Finally, he reinforces Macbeth's extreme degree of isolation and feeling of imprisonment within his own haunted thoughts in this decisive moment; this dagger vision is the very last scene prior to the murder of Duncan, which strengthens our uncomfortable sense of identification with Macbeth and our awareness that it is ultimately he alone, and not his wife, who takes the final murderous step; although agreeing to commit the act is their moment of greatest unity as husband and wife, the reality of the deed itself begins to drive them apart and to divide Macbeth from the rest of humanity.

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...

How did the United States become an imperial power?

"Imperial power" is a bit of a vague label. It tends to mean several things at once, so let's unpack it. In the sense of "this country was built on conquest by force," the "imperial power" part of America actually predates the United States proper. The territories that would become the United States were imperial colonies, established by the great European empires of the 17th and 18th centuries. Much of the US Constitution and American governance generally goes back to England, history's largest and most successful imperial power, but vital aspects of American culture come from other imperial powers, such as France and Spain. Much of American culture comes from sources other than the old empires, but they were key influences on what the United States became. In the sense of "this country treats conquest by force as a fundamental component of its culture, economy and politics," the United States has always been an imperial power. Even earl...

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...