Skip to main content

Why do you think Shakespeare has Macbeth stand alone on stage when he speaks about what he can see?

Of the three scenes in which Macbeth sees apparitions or hallucinations, he's actually only alone on stage in one of them. When he's visited by the bloodied corpse of Banquo at the banquet, he is accompanied by his wife and several lords. In Act IV, the witches share the stage with him as he receives the series of visions and prophecies which guide his actions through the remainder of the play. So I assume you're...

Of the three scenes in which Macbeth sees apparitions or hallucinations, he's actually only alone on stage in one of them. When he's visited by the bloodied corpse of Banquo at the banquet, he is accompanied by his wife and several lords. In Act IV, the witches share the stage with him as he receives the series of visions and prophecies which guide his actions through the remainder of the play. So I assume you're referring to his hallucination of the "air-drawn dagger" shortly before the murder of Duncan. Perhaps the most straightforward reason for why Macbeth receives this portent alone is to create a degree of ambiguity as to whether the dagger is a "false creation," an illusion emanating from Macbeth's own mind and desires, or a genuine supernatural manifestation. This in turn reflects one of the play's largest thematic questions, which is the uncertain relationship between human will and predestination, unknown and possibly malevolent forces which guide our actions and fates. We know that supernatural phenomena occur in this play, because the witches' prophecies are accurate (though deliberately misleading), but we also see that apparently paranormal happenings (like the march of Birnam wood toward Dunsinane) can have more rational explanations. We're also given reason to believe that Macbeth suffers from some non-specific neurological affliction which causes visual and auditory hallucinations; upon his rapt reaction to the ghost of Banquo, Lady Macbeth anxiously tells the guests "my lord is often thus, and hath been since his youth... the fit is momentary." She could arguably be lying about his medical history, of course, but it tracks with what Shakespeare has shown us, since Macbeth has had two prior hallucinations in the play, immediately before Duncan's death (the dagger) and immediately after (when he hears a disembodied voice cry "Sleep no more!").


So by placing Macbeth alone on stage when he sees the bloody dagger pointing his path to Duncan, Shakespeare achieves several functions at once. By creating an atmosphere of ambiguity about the objective reality of this uncanny event, he presents a visual metaphor for the play's central, haunting question, regarding Macbeth's degree of control over his own actions. He also preserves for later (the banquet scene) the spectacle of Macbeth terrified by a vision that no one else can see. Finally, he reinforces Macbeth's extreme degree of isolation and feeling of imprisonment within his own haunted thoughts in this decisive moment; this dagger vision is the very last scene prior to the murder of Duncan, which strengthens our uncomfortable sense of identification with Macbeth and our awareness that it is ultimately he alone, and not his wife, who takes the final murderous step; although agreeing to commit the act is their moment of greatest unity as husband and wife, the reality of the deed itself begins to drive them apart and to divide Macbeth from the rest of humanity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...