Skip to main content

How can cultural differences and dissimilar value systems lead to communication problems or misunderstandings?

Cultural identity, and the related value system, of any group is based on fundamental principles, which guide worldviews. Worldviews, or ways of interpreting the surrounding world, play a huge role in communication. Fundamental assumptions drive interpersonal interactions, so when these assumptions are different, communication can go haywire.


For example, consider the differences between individualistic cultures (of western countries like the US) and collectivistic cultures (of eastern countries like Japan). In individualistic cultures, people make decisions...

Cultural identity, and the related value system, of any group is based on fundamental principles, which guide worldviews. Worldviews, or ways of interpreting the surrounding world, play a huge role in communication. Fundamental assumptions drive interpersonal interactions, so when these assumptions are different, communication can go haywire.


For example, consider the differences between individualistic cultures (of western countries like the US) and collectivistic cultures (of eastern countries like Japan). In individualistic cultures, people make decisions based on their own self worth and personal goals. The idea in cultures that are self-focused is that, while society is important, it is more important to succeed as an individual. On the other hand, collectivistic cultures tend to value the success of a group over individual success.


What's important to understand is that the responses are very different in their basic assumptions. While a person from an individualistic culture may value and praise a young person charting her own path, a person from a collectivistic culture may be disappointed or offended by this person's decisions.


In conversation, differences like these can become apparent when two or more people feel very differently about an issue. Often, culture is driven by morality, which is very often tied to religion. Consider the difference in value systems between religions.


Whereas Buddhism values peaceful resolution of conflict, Christianity has sometimes been driven by a violent "eye-for-an-eye" mentality. If you ask a person whose culture has been influence by Buddhism how to solve an international dispute, the answer might be very different than that of a person whose culture is influenced by Christianity. In fact, people from different cultures may be appalled by the suggestions of the opposite group. To a Buddhist, a Christian's desire to enter a war to "protect" their country may seem like a poor decision filled with hate. On the other hand, a Christian may see a Buddhist's desire to peacefully resolve a war as a weak response to conflict.


Because cultural identity is so dependent on morality, the fundamental assumptions of people with different backgrounds are likely to disrupt communication on even the most basic of issues.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...
Post a Comment
Read more