Skip to main content

Is postmodern art a passing phase of nonsense or an exciting and innovative treasure?

The reasons you can argue that postmodernist art is a passing phase of nonsense are that it breaks from traditions in the history of art, seeking to produce something that cannot be understood through the lens we use to look at traditional art. If we are looking at postmodern art through the lens we use to understand Renaissance art, it seems like nonsense. This is because the goals of Renaissance art and the goals of postmodernist art are not the same. Renaissance art wants to show the most accurate depiction of the human form, of nature, and anything else we see in the world, even if it is attempting to paint something supernatural (see for example how Michelangelo depicts heaven in his ceiling for the Sistine Chapel). We could say that Renaissance art wants to give answers (to questions such as what heaven looks like, for example), but postmodernist art wants to ask questions. For that reason, we could argue that it is not a passing phase of nonsense but an exciting and innovative treasure. Postmodernist art offers a new perspective of the world and tries to give shape to abstract concepts and ideas. Andy Warhol's soup cans, for example, ask us to consider if soup cans could be art. Art becomes an abstract idea in that case, because if we are asking this question, then it suggests we do not already know what art is. Duchamp's readymades ask the same questions--is this art or not? Can a urinal be art? Instead of looking out at the world and showing what the world looks like, as Renaissance art does, postmodernist art looks in on itself, asking what art is.

We could also argue that it is an exciting and innovative treasure because after the industrial revolution and the rise of the city and of the science of psychology (all of which happened within 100 years), people's roles in life shifted. It became more common for people to want to seek out their identities outside of their jobs and families, asking "Who am I? What is the essence of my identity?" Postmodern art is reflecting this moment in history, asking the same questions of itself. 


If we consider postmodern art from the perspective we use to consider Renaissance art, it will seem like nonsense. If we consider it from a historical perspective or a perspective of questioning what art is, it seems like an exciting and innovative treasure. 

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How did the United States become an imperial power?

"Imperial power" is a bit of a vague label. It tends to mean several things at once, so let's unpack it. In the sense of "this country was built on conquest by force," the "imperial power" part of America actually predates the United States proper. The territories that would become the United States were imperial colonies, established by the great European empires of the 17th and 18th centuries. Much of the US Constitution and American governance generally goes back to England, history's largest and most successful imperial power, but vital aspects of American culture come from other imperial powers, such as France and Spain. Much of American culture comes from sources other than the old empires, but they were key influences on what the United States became. In the sense of "this country treats conquest by force as a fundamental component of its culture, economy and politics," the United States has always been an imperial power. Even earl...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more