Skip to main content

Is postmodern art a passing phase of nonsense or an exciting and innovative treasure?

The reasons you can argue that postmodernist art is a passing phase of nonsense are that it breaks from traditions in the history of art, seeking to produce something that cannot be understood through the lens we use to look at traditional art. If we are looking at postmodern art through the lens we use to understand Renaissance art, it seems like nonsense. This is because the goals of Renaissance art and the goals of postmodernist art are not the same. Renaissance art wants to show the most accurate depiction of the human form, of nature, and anything else we see in the world, even if it is attempting to paint something supernatural (see for example how Michelangelo depicts heaven in his ceiling for the Sistine Chapel). We could say that Renaissance art wants to give answers (to questions such as what heaven looks like, for example), but postmodernist art wants to ask questions. For that reason, we could argue that it is not a passing phase of nonsense but an exciting and innovative treasure. Postmodernist art offers a new perspective of the world and tries to give shape to abstract concepts and ideas. Andy Warhol's soup cans, for example, ask us to consider if soup cans could be art. Art becomes an abstract idea in that case, because if we are asking this question, then it suggests we do not already know what art is. Duchamp's readymades ask the same questions--is this art or not? Can a urinal be art? Instead of looking out at the world and showing what the world looks like, as Renaissance art does, postmodernist art looks in on itself, asking what art is.

We could also argue that it is an exciting and innovative treasure because after the industrial revolution and the rise of the city and of the science of psychology (all of which happened within 100 years), people's roles in life shifted. It became more common for people to want to seek out their identities outside of their jobs and families, asking "Who am I? What is the essence of my identity?" Postmodern art is reflecting this moment in history, asking the same questions of itself. 


If we consider postmodern art from the perspective we use to consider Renaissance art, it will seem like nonsense. If we consider it from a historical perspective or a perspective of questioning what art is, it seems like an exciting and innovative treasure. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...
Post a Comment
Read more