Skip to main content

Some political scientists argue that social capital is disappearing. What is social capital?

Social capital is our network or web of relationships with others that is of benefit to us. These can be formal, such as membership in a club or informal, such as a group of friends.  This can be a very loose arrangement, such as a group of neighbors who are acquainted with one another, or a closer arrangement, a person's one or two best friends. 


Benefits that accrue as a result of social capital are...

Social capital is our network or web of relationships with others that is of benefit to us. These can be formal, such as membership in a club or informal, such as a group of friends.  This can be a very loose arrangement, such as a group of neighbors who are acquainted with one another, or a closer arrangement, a person's one or two best friends. 


Benefits that accrue as a result of social capital are many and varied. When a distant relative told me her son was looking for a position as a teacher in St. Louis, I remembered that I had gone to law school with someone who had a successful practice there, and I checked with him and then passed on his name.  Networking, thus, relies on social capital to help one find work.  When my neighbors across the street went out of town, I offered to keep an eye on the house and take in the mail for them.  This social capital benefits both of us, giving me an opportunity to be helpful and them some peace of mind. When people are looking for funds for a cause, they call upon those whom they know to raise money, which capitalizes on their social capital.  There is social capital in a book group, which brings people together to discuss the books they read in common for the pleasure of the discussion (and usually a good snack, too.) All the various relationships we have create our social capital, whether we choose to call upon it or not.


I do not know if you are expected to write a response to that statement, but I must say I do not agree with it.  I suspect that the statement is based to some degree on how many people now choose to live alone and how many people build much of their social capital through social media.  However, living alone does not mean not having social capital.  Most people have it through their neighborhoods, their school or work, or through family.  And I am not convinced so far that building social capital by way of social media is any less effective that building it in person.  I see people who have never met one another reaching out and helping the other all the time, in ways tangible and intangible, on social media.  A woman I have never met in person, who is the cousin of a good friend, is my friend on Facebook, and she has invited me to stay at her house!  I think it is fair to say that social capital is evolving in many ways that none of us could ever have imagined even ten years ago.  


In another vein, I have also seen the term "social capital" used to mean the lingua franca that helps bring us together in our social discourse, so that one can count on people having read particular authors, having knowledge of certain kinds of music, and having tastes and preferences of a certain sort, so that conversations can be filled with allusions that are a shortcut conversationally, with references that others will be able to understand.  This sort of social capital does seem to be disappearing rapidly, with my generation (the baby boomers) seeming to be the last to use it. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...