Skip to main content

Why do we still need the Equal Rights Amendment to be approved and added to the United States Constitution?

First of all, we have to recognize that there are many people who would say that we do not need an equal rights amendment to the Constitution.  Some of these are conservatives who believe that women already have enough rights or that we should be careful about giving women equal rights because it would lead to women being drafted into the military or men being allowed in women’s bathrooms.  Others are not necessarily conservative but they believe that the problems that women face today are not really because of legal discrimination and would not be solved by an equal rights amendment.  For example, women tend to make less money than men today, but that is largely not because of any conscious discrimination.  Instead, women tend to cluster in poorly-paid jobs and women in good jobs often do not climb as high because they have to take time off to raise children.  An equal rights amendment would not solve either of these problems.  For these reasons, there are many people who would disagree with the premise of this question.

However, let us assume that we do need an equal rights amendment.  There are two main reasons for this.  First, an amendment would subject laws that discriminate on the basis of sex to the same “strict scrutiny” standard as laws that discriminate on the basis of race.   Right now, laws that treat men and women differently are not subjected to this level of scrutiny.  This means that it is easier for a law to be upheld by courts if it discriminates on the basis of sex than if it does so on the basis of race.  Second, and perhaps more importantly, an equal rights amendment would send a message, even if it would not have that much of a legal impact.  Right now, our Constitution grants greater protection from discrimination on the basis of race.  This might send the message that discrimination on the basis of sex is simply not such a big deal.  It implies that we don’t need to care enough to ban such discrimination in the Constitution.  If we added such an amendment, it would make a statement about our values.  It would clearly state that we believe that sexual discrimination is just as bad as racial discrimination.  This might not have much of a legal, tangible effect, but it would send a message that would eventually help to change our society.


For more arguments in favor of an equal rights amendment, please follow the links below.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

In Martel's Life of Pi, how does writing a diary help Pi Patel build on his leadership skills?

At the end of chapter 73, Pi first divulges the fact that he had started a diary after about a week alone at sea. Pi claims that he wrote about "practical stuff" (208) such as what he caught for food, foreseeable problems and solutions, Richard Parker, and reflections about specific events that occurred. In a sense, Pi is the captain of his ship; therefore, he must take responsibility for himself and his crew. He can... At the end of chapter 73, Pi first divulges the fact that he had started a diary after about a week alone at sea. Pi claims that he wrote about "practical stuff" (208) such as what he caught for food, foreseeable problems and solutions, Richard Parker, and reflections about specific events that occurred. In a sense, Pi is the captain of his ship; therefore, he must take responsibility for himself and his crew. He can do this by writing down events, problems and solutions, and reflections to look back on when confronted with repeated problems. It can ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why did Tybalt attack and kill Mercutio instead of Romeo, who he had originally been targeting?

Though Tybalt's quarrel is with Romeo, he begins the momentous duel in Act 3 by fighting with and killing Mercutio instead. Tybalt ultimately attacks Mercutio because the garrulous and hot-headed character insults Tybalt and goads him into a duel to protect Romeo's honor. From the beginning of the encounter in Act 3, Scene 1, it's clear that Mercutio is itching for a fight. For instance, when Tybalt signals that he wants to talk to Mercutio... Though Tybalt's quarrel is with Romeo, he begins the momentous duel in Act 3 by fighting with and killing Mercutio instead. Tybalt ultimately attacks Mercutio because the garrulous and hot-headed character insults Tybalt and goads him into a duel to protect Romeo's honor. From the beginning of the encounter in Act 3, Scene 1, it's clear that Mercutio is itching for a fight. For instance, when Tybalt signals that he wants to talk to Mercutio and Benvolio, Mercutio responds "And but one word with one of us?/ Couple it w...
Post a Comment
Read more