Skip to main content

How did Martin Luther King, Jr. propose to end injustice?

Dr. King believed that nonviolent civil disobedience would end injustice.


Dr. King believed that people had a moral duty to oppose injustice.  He was not passive in suggesting that individuals must respond to evil in the world.  He proposed that individuals embrace nonviolence as a means to end injustice.  Nonviolent civil disobedience would transform the souls of individuals who perpetrate injustice:


I do not want to give the impression that non- violence will work miracles...

Dr. King believed that nonviolent civil disobedience would end injustice.


Dr. King believed that people had a moral duty to oppose injustice.  He was not passive in suggesting that individuals must respond to evil in the world.  He proposed that individuals embrace nonviolence as a means to end injustice.  Nonviolent civil disobedience would transform the souls of individuals who perpetrate injustice:



I do not want to give the impression that non- violence will work miracles overnight. Men are not easily moved from mental ruts or purged of their prejudice and irrational feelings. When the underprivileged demand freedom, the privileged first react with bitterness and resistance. Even when the demands are couched in non-violent terms, the initial response is the same... The non-violent approach does not immediately change the hearts of the oppressor. It first does something to the hearts and souls of those committed to it.... Finally, it reaches the opponent and so stirs his conscience that reconciliation becomes a reality.



Dr. King felt that challenging injustice through nonviolence would "stir" the conscience, and cause change.  He believed that civil disobedience rooted in non-violent opposition creates the conditions that will end injustice. He wanted to awaken the conscience of those who carried out injustice.  In getting them to see the inhumanity of their actions, Dr. King felt that injustice would end.


Dr. King's proposition to end injustice carries a moral responsibility.  He felt that people have to commit themselves to being of the best character they can be in order to achieve change.  Dr. King would argue that ending injustice through violence is not morally permissible.  Even through the end result is achieved, the means through which it is accomplished does not create the reality of change.  Violence and injustice in one form has become supplanted with another.  It is for this reason that he believed that nonviolent civil disobedience was the best and most lasting way to end injustice.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...
Post a Comment
Read more