Skip to main content

How did Martin Luther King, Jr. propose to end injustice?

Dr. King believed that nonviolent civil disobedience would end injustice.


Dr. King believed that people had a moral duty to oppose injustice.  He was not passive in suggesting that individuals must respond to evil in the world.  He proposed that individuals embrace nonviolence as a means to end injustice.  Nonviolent civil disobedience would transform the souls of individuals who perpetrate injustice:


I do not want to give the impression that non- violence will work miracles...

Dr. King believed that nonviolent civil disobedience would end injustice.


Dr. King believed that people had a moral duty to oppose injustice.  He was not passive in suggesting that individuals must respond to evil in the world.  He proposed that individuals embrace nonviolence as a means to end injustice.  Nonviolent civil disobedience would transform the souls of individuals who perpetrate injustice:



I do not want to give the impression that non- violence will work miracles overnight. Men are not easily moved from mental ruts or purged of their prejudice and irrational feelings. When the underprivileged demand freedom, the privileged first react with bitterness and resistance. Even when the demands are couched in non-violent terms, the initial response is the same... The non-violent approach does not immediately change the hearts of the oppressor. It first does something to the hearts and souls of those committed to it.... Finally, it reaches the opponent and so stirs his conscience that reconciliation becomes a reality.



Dr. King felt that challenging injustice through nonviolence would "stir" the conscience, and cause change.  He believed that civil disobedience rooted in non-violent opposition creates the conditions that will end injustice. He wanted to awaken the conscience of those who carried out injustice.  In getting them to see the inhumanity of their actions, Dr. King felt that injustice would end.


Dr. King's proposition to end injustice carries a moral responsibility.  He felt that people have to commit themselves to being of the best character they can be in order to achieve change.  Dr. King would argue that ending injustice through violence is not morally permissible.  Even through the end result is achieved, the means through which it is accomplished does not create the reality of change.  Violence and injustice in one form has become supplanted with another.  It is for this reason that he believed that nonviolent civil disobedience was the best and most lasting way to end injustice.

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...

How did the United States become an imperial power?

"Imperial power" is a bit of a vague label. It tends to mean several things at once, so let's unpack it. In the sense of "this country was built on conquest by force," the "imperial power" part of America actually predates the United States proper. The territories that would become the United States were imperial colonies, established by the great European empires of the 17th and 18th centuries. Much of the US Constitution and American governance generally goes back to England, history's largest and most successful imperial power, but vital aspects of American culture come from other imperial powers, such as France and Spain. Much of American culture comes from sources other than the old empires, but they were key influences on what the United States became. In the sense of "this country treats conquest by force as a fundamental component of its culture, economy and politics," the United States has always been an imperial power. Even earl...

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...