Skip to main content

Why was Prohibition repealed?

The Prohibition Act of 1920, which illegalized the sale, distribution, and manufacture of liquor, was repealed in 1933. The act was ratified as an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, becoming the Eighteenth Amendment. The Twenty-First Amendment then repealed the Eighteenth.

Prohibition was repealed because it was very difficult to enact. The prohibition of the legal sale, distribution, and manufacture of liquor did not quell the public's appetite for it. On the contrary, that thirst was quenched by organized criminal syndicates. Many of history's best-known mobsters, including Al Capone, got a great deal of their business from selling liquor. 


When criminals take over a trade that is as lucrative as the liquor business, they use violence to eliminate their competition. Their competitors became their murder victims. The St. Valentine's Day Massacre, led by Capone, is the most notorious example of a criminal syndicate trying to rid itself of competition in the liquor market. We can compare this with the violence we see today between drug gangs and cartels.


Speakeasies also sprang up in the 1920s. These were bars and nightclubs placed in locations where one would not expect for there to be a bar or a nightclub, such as, perhaps, an old warehouse. The name "speakeasy" is derived from the act of uttering a password to a guard from outside the door before being allowed entry.


Speakeasies were relatively safe spaces in which one could party and drink. In some instances, they were also managed by mobsters, in others, by "bootleggers." A number of businessmen in the 1920s became quite wealthy from operating speakeasies, which was considered a shameful way to make one's fortune. Bootlegging was one of Joseph Kennedy, Sr.'s many enterprises. In The Great Gatsby, Gatsby's nemesis, Tom Buchanan, accuses the protagonist of acquiring his fortune through bootlegging.


There were also plenty of people neither involved in organized crime nor with speakeasies who made liquor at home. The "hootch" or "bathtub gin" that they produced was usually for their own consumption, or for that of family and friends.


The fact that there were so many people involved in either the manufacture, sale, or distribution of liquor meant that many people were arrested and imprisoned for the crime, though most offenders were non-violent. This drove up the cost of law enforcement, as more police officers, jails, and prisons were required to deal with offenders.


Another, albeit more minor, reason why Prohibition ended is that, by the late 1920s, popular support for Prohibition had waned. Initially, the cause was championed by temperance groups with both religious and moderate members. All were concerned about the negative social impacts of alcoholism and drunkenness: violence, particularly that which was directed at women and children by alcoholic husbands and fathers, homelessness, the street harassment and rape of women, and various preventable illnesses.


Secondly, a decade after the Eighteenth Amendment was enacted, the temperance movement had been overtaken by religious zealots and nativists -- that is, bigots who tried to keep immigrants out of the country.


Overall, the main reason why Prohibition did not last is probably because it is very difficult to legislate human behavior when that behavior poses no direct threat to anyone else. People wanted to drink, so they found ways to do so. In trying to legislate that desire, the government invited more crime, caused more tax expenditures, and, ultimately, did nothing to convince people to stop drinking. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...