Skip to main content

What does King Lear mean when he says "Let me wipe it first; it smells of mortality"?

In Act IV, Scene 6, there is a pathetic and funny meeting between two old men, Lear and Gloucester, who have lost everything because they trusted their children. Gloucester says:


O, let me kiss that hand.


This is when Lear says:


Let me wipe it first: it smells of mortality.


Lear has been living out in the open country for a long time. He is ragged and dirty, but still has some courtly manners. He...

In Act IV, Scene 6, there is a pathetic and funny meeting between two old men, Lear and Gloucester, who have lost everything because they trusted their children. Gloucester says:



O, let me kiss that hand.



This is when Lear says:



Let me wipe it first: it smells of mortality.



Lear has been living out in the open country for a long time. He is ragged and dirty, but still has some courtly manners. He is still concerned about how he looks and how he smells. Shakespeare intended this line, and the action that accompanies it, to get a laugh from his audience. Lear smells his own hand first and then wipes it on his rags. Everyone knows what he means when he says it smells of mortality" Lear smells his own excrement on his hand. He has been relieving himself out of doors as best he can, but hasn't been able to wash his hands afterwards. The implication is that he hates humanity by now and that the smell on his hand reminds him of his opinion of humanity, or mortality. This is why the audience would laugh. There is a lot of action to go with the line. Lear smells his hand first, then wipes it, then says it smells of mortality. The audience expects him to say it smells of something else first, but he pauses and considers, and then says "mortality" instead of a different (four-letter) word.


William Faulkner, who had a cynical opinion of humanity, was quoted as saying something similar about humankind: 



When [Malcolm] Cowley, for example, wrote asking if it would be fair to call his work a “myth or legend of the South,” Faulkner testily replied that the South “is not very important to me,” adding, in a gratuitous discharge of bile, that in his opinion human life is “the same frantic steeplechase toward nothing everywhere and man stinks the same stink no matter where in time.”
Frederick Crews, “Faulkner Methodized,” in The Critics Bear It Away: American Fiction and the Academy


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more