Skip to main content

What is the percentage of children who live below the poverty line in the US? What do you think living in poverty does to the decision-making of...

According to the National Center for Children in Poverty (see the link below), 22% of American children live in poverty. That means they live below the federal poverty level of $23,550 a year for a family of four. Many of their parents work but earn too little to support their children or have interrupted employment. According to UNICEF (see the link below), the U.S. ranks 36 out of 41 among industrialized nations for its rate...

According to the National Center for Children in Poverty (see the link below), 22% of American children live in poverty. That means they live below the federal poverty level of $23,550 a year for a family of four. Many of their parents work but earn too little to support their children or have interrupted employment. According to UNICEF (see the link below), the U.S. ranks 36 out of 41 among industrialized nations for its rate of childhood poverty. In other words, childhood poverty is worse in the U.S. than in most industrialized nations. In Norway, only 5.3% of children live in poverty. 


The Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics reported that in 2010, 22% of children lived with food insecurity, meaning that at certain points of the month or year, the family has a less-than-adequate food supply. For example, the parents could be out of work, or the family could be waiting for payments from the government (which often are inadequate and run out by the end of the month). Food insecurity contributes to the inability of poor families to provide nutritious meals to their children, in spite of their best intent to do so. In addition, poverty and the resulting chaos it imposes on a family mean that poor families cannot often plan for meals, and the parents have limited decisions about what kinds of food they can provide. Poor parents often do not have the money to drive to stores (which may be located a far distance away) and to buy all the ingredients necessary to make nutritious meals in advance. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more