Skip to main content

Why, once her grandmother is defeated, does the narrator feel "triumphant yet strangely saddened"?

The narrator felt 'triumphant, yet strangely saddened' after winning the argument because she had hurt her grandmother and made her sad.


According to the story, the narrator's grandmother had taken her into a part of the gully she had never visited before; the purpose of the trip was to allow the narrator to see a very tall palm tree situated in a clearing amidst the densest foliage.


When the narrator's grandmother asked whether there was...

The narrator felt 'triumphant, yet strangely saddened' after winning the argument because she had hurt her grandmother and made her sad.


According to the story, the narrator's grandmother had taken her into a part of the gully she had never visited before; the purpose of the trip was to allow the narrator to see a very tall palm tree situated in a clearing amidst the densest foliage.


When the narrator's grandmother asked whether there was anything taller than the palm tree in New York City, the narrator asserted that the buildings in the city were 'hundreds of times' taller than the palm tree. In fact, she maintained that The Empire State Building was taller than the palm tree because it had over a hundred floors. When the grandmother became exasperated, the narrator argued that the Empire State Building was even taller than Bissex Hill, a hill she had previously visited on the island.


When the grandmother became angry at the narrator, the narrator clinched the argument by crowing that she could send her grandmother a postcard to prove her claims. At this announcement, the grandmother knew she was beaten. The text tells us that the 'stubborn light' in her eyes had then dimmed, and she had 'turned and started back through the gully, walking slowly, her steps groping and uncertain, as if she were suddenly no longer sure of the way...' So, the narrator's victory was bitter-sweet; she had won the argument, but she had also succeeded in humiliating and hurting her grandmother.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more