Skip to main content

How would one approach writing the summation speech of Mr. Gilmer, the prosecuting attorney, to convince the jury to find Tom Robinson guilty,...

In a U.S. court of law, summation speeches are given first by the prosecuting attorney, which is Mr. Gilmer in Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, and second by the defense attorney, Atticus. One main goal of a summation speech is to summarize the facts and evidence of the case as they have been presented by the witnesses to the court. However, the main purpose of a summation speech is to persuade the jury to take the side of either the prosecution or the defense. To persuade the jury, both the prosecuting and defense attorneys will extensively use rhetorical devices in their summation speeches such as logos, ethos, and pathos.

Logos is an appeal to reason. The presentation of all of the facts of the case serves as logos. So, one thing you will want to do in writing your summation speech for Mr. Gilmer is summarize all of the details of the case as they were presented by both Mayella Ewell, the alleged victim, and her father, the alleged witness of the crime. For example, you would summarize the fact that Mayella asked Tom Robinson to cut up a chiffarobe, invited him into the house to pay him a nickle, and was attacked by Robinson inside her home. You would also summarize Ewell's statement that he ran when he heard her screaming and saw through the house window Robinson sexually assault Mayella.

Ethos is an appeal to ethics but it more specifically refers to the ethics of the speaker. If we are willing to see the speaker as a having "good sense, good moral character, and goodwill," then we are more likely to believe the speaker (Dr. John R. Edlund, "Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade"). Pathos is an appeal to emotions. One thing Mr. Gilmer's summation speech would do is appeal to the ethical beliefs held by and the emotions felt by the members of the jury, especially those beliefs and emotions that align with his own, and, unfortunately, their senses of ethics and emotions are based on prejudiced beliefs.

In his own summation speech to the jury, Atticus actually reveals the prejudiced beliefs the prosecution is relying on to both build the prosecution's argument and persuade the jury. Mr. Gilman would develop his ethos and pathos based on these prejudiced beliefs. In his closing remarks to the jury, Atticus points out that the "witnesses for the state," meaning Mayella and her father, presented their testimonies with the assumption that their testimonies would never be questioned. More importantly, they made this assumption based on prejudices and the assumption that the members of the jury would agree with their prejudices; even the prosecuting attorney has based his line of questioning grounded on the exact same prejudices. We see Atticus lay out the fact that the prosecution's case was all based on prejudiced assumptions in his following remarks:


The witnesses for the state ... have presented themselves to you gentleman, to this court, in the cynical confidence that their testimony would not be doubted, confident that you gentleman would go along with them on the assumption--the evil assumption--that all Negroes lie, that all Negroes are basically immoral beings, that all Negro men are not to be trusted around our women. (Ch. 20)



Hence, in writing the closing remarks to the jury for Mr. Gilmer, the prosecuting attorney, you will want your words to reflect this unfortunate racist mentality because it is this racist mentality that will appeal to the jury's sense of ethics and emotional inclinations. Mr. Gilmer would speak forthrightly about the belief that "all Negroes are basically immoral" because he is confident that the members of the jury, as well as most of the spectators in the courtroom, would agree with him, which makes it his most persuasive argument.

All in all, Mr. Gilmer's closing speech to the jury would confidently express Robinson's guilt by first summarizing the details of the crime then referring to the commonly held prejudiced belief that all African Americans are immoral and tend towards criminal activity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...