Skip to main content

What is revolutionary about the rights laid out in the Declaration of Independence?

Democracies had existed before in history.  Classical Athens had a democracy.  Republics were also popular throughout history as well--most of the Founding Fathers looked to Rome as a model for their government.  What made the Declaration of Independence so unique was that it said that three basic rights--life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness--were given to everyone from birth.  Unlike Athens and Rome, there were to be no class distinctions in America.  While Thomas Jefferson...

Democracies had existed before in history.  Classical Athens had a democracy.  Republics were also popular throughout history as well--most of the Founding Fathers looked to Rome as a model for their government.  What made the Declaration of Independence so unique was that it said that three basic rights--life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness--were given to everyone from birth.  Unlike Athens and Rome, there were to be no class distinctions in America.  While Thomas Jefferson did own slaves and nearly everyone agreed that the Declaration of Independence did not apply towards women, Native Americans, and African-Americans, the document was unique in that it gave the same rights to all free men.  


Another thing that was unique and even dangerous was that the Declaration of Independence gave the people the right to overthrow their government when it was not responsive to the needs of the people.  Jefferson even lays out the case for this when he describes British practices of arbitrary taxation and quartering soldiers in the colonies.  By giving the people the right to choose their own government, Jefferson implied that government exists for the people, not people for the government.  Of course, Jefferson follows up his proclamation that the people have the right to overthrow their government with the word "prudence," which means that the people should not undertake this responsibility lightly.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...
Post a Comment
Read more