Skip to main content

What are three reasons that the Prince's response to Tybalt's death is fair or unfair?

In Act III, Scene 1, both Mercutio and Tybalt are killed in a street fight. Mercutio is stabbed by Tybalt while Romeo is attempting to break up the fight. Once Mercutio dies, Tybalt, who had run away, inexplicably returns to the scene where he is promptly challenged and killed by the grieving Romeo. When the Prince arrives, he listens to Benvolio, who had been a witness to the violence, give an account of the fight....

In Act III, Scene 1, both Mercutio and Tybalt are killed in a street fight. Mercutio is stabbed by Tybalt while Romeo is attempting to break up the fight. Once Mercutio dies, Tybalt, who had run away, inexplicably returns to the scene where he is promptly challenged and killed by the grieving Romeo. When the Prince arrives, he listens to Benvolio, who had been a witness to the violence, give an account of the fight. Benvolio explains truthfully, although Lady Capulet says he is lying. Her version, however, is actually full of lies, claiming that the Montagues had ganged up on Tybalt. She demands the death penalty for Romeo. The Prince listens and his judgement is that Romeo should be banished from Verona. This verdict is unacceptable to Lady Capulet because earlier in the play the Prince had decreed that the penalty for fighting in the streets would be death, with no exceptions.


The Prince's decision is fair for three reasons. First, Tybalt instigated the fight by challenging Romeo and then insulting him by calling him a "villain." Second, even though Mercutio's death was somewhat of an accident, Tybalt was responsible and should have received the Prince's penalty of death. Third, because Tybalt returned to the scene, it is fair to believe that Romeo was simply defending himself against a man who had earlier threatened him.


One might also argue that the Prince's decision was unfair. One argument (Lady Capulet's) might claim that Romeo should suffer the death penalty because that was the law and Romeo should have understood that fighting in the street would bring the harshest judgement. Another argument that Romeo should face the death penalty is that Romeo was actually at fault for Mercutio's death as well as Tybalt's. Romeo should have initially fought his own battle and not allowed his friend to take his place. Romeo even admits this just before Tybalt returns:





This gentleman, the Prince’s near ally,
My very friend, hath got this mortal hurt
In my behalf. My reputation stained
With Tybalt’s slander—Tybalt, that an hour
Hath been my cousin! O sweet Juliet,
Thy beauty hath made me effeminate
And in my temper softened valor’s steel.





Another way to look at the decision would be to argue that even banishment was totally unfair to Romeo. After all, he did all he could to attempt to stop the fighting between Tybalt and Mercutio. He backed down to Tybalt and even told Tybalt that he loved him. When Mercutio was stabbed, Romeo was only trying to break things up. Tybalt was at fault for virtually everything that happened, and Romeo was only reacting to the shock of seeing his best friend dead.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can you analyze the poem "Absolution" by Siegfried Sassoon?

Sure! Siegfried Sassoon fought in World War I and was wounded in battle; he spent much of his life speaking out against war, and these pacifist feelings are easy to see in his poems. This one, "Absolution," was published in 1917, the same year that Sassoon was hospitalized for what we know today as post-traumatic stress disorder. "Absolution" is a short poem that contains three stanzas of four lines each. The word "absolution" means "forgiveness," and... Sure! Siegfried Sassoon fought in World War I and was wounded in battle; he spent much of his life speaking out against war, and these pacifist feelings are easy to see in his poems. This one, "Absolution," was published in 1917, the same year that Sassoon was hospitalized for what we know today as post-traumatic stress disorder. "Absolution" is a short poem that contains three stanzas of four lines each. The word "absolution" means "forgiveness," and the v...

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...