Skip to main content

Why is it tragic that Gatsby chooses Daisy to embody his dream?

I'm not sure I can agree with this claim. We may find that the real tragedy lies elsewhere. It is possible that we can identify the source of Gatsby's tragedy as his own greed, rather than his "choosing" of Daisy. Nick describes the way Gatsby felt when he was first courting Daisy, how he knew that it was a "colossal accident" that he was in her home, that he was "penniless" and had nothing like...

I'm not sure I can agree with this claim. We may find that the real tragedy lies elsewhere. It is possible that we can identify the source of Gatsby's tragedy as his own greed, rather than his "choosing" of Daisy. Nick describes the way Gatsby felt when he was first courting Daisy, how he knew that it was a "colossal accident" that he was in her home, that he was "penniless" and had nothing like what she already had. However,



"He took what he could get, ravenously and unscrupulously -- eventually he took Daisy one still October night, took her because he had no real right to touch her hand."



Gatsby lied to Daisy, allowed her to believe that he came from a family like hers, that he could offer her a life like the one she knew, and "he had deliberately given [her] a sense of security."  It was only after he had already committed himself to her that he began to actually love her.  


If Gatsby had not behaved in such an unscrupulous way, deliberately deceiving a young woman who didn't know any better than to be trusting, then his life wouldn't have ended tragically. It was his greed, his own flaws that started him down this path, and so I think it is necessary that we fault him, at least in part, for his sad end.  He used her, or he tried to, and so we cannot let him completely off the hook and blame Daisy alone.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more