Skip to main content

I need to analyze the nature and psychology of guilt in Wilkie Collins' The Moonstone and Doyle's The Hound of the Baskervilles for an essay. I...

In Collins's Moonstone and Doyle's The Hound of the Baskervilles, characters are often confused about each others' and their own guilt. Innocent people often seem guilty, while guilty people often seem innocent. The Moonstoneis particularly interesting because one of the narrators, Franklin Blake, who is collecting the documents necessary to the case, turns out to be the culprit. Unknown to himself, he has taken the diamond that is at the center of the...

In Collins's Moonstone and Doyle's The Hound of the Baskervilles, characters are often confused about each others' and their own guilt. Innocent people often seem guilty, while guilty people often seem innocent. The Moonstone is particularly interesting because one of the narrators, Franklin Blake, who is collecting the documents necessary to the case, turns out to be the culprit. Unknown to himself, he has taken the diamond that is at the center of the story while drugged. While uncovering this whodunit, he finds that he has unwittingly committed the crime, so his narration throws off the reader. In addition, the aptly named Godfrey Ablewhite, a good-looking, rich man, seems the picture of innocence until he is revealed to be guilty. Therefore, appearances are not what they seem. Two innocent-seeming men are shown to be guilty, while the Indians accused of the crime are innocent. However, while Franklin Blake and Godfrey Ablewhite are both guilty, one is guilty purposefully, while the other is guilty through no fault of his own (because he has been drugged). Therefore, Collins implies that guilt also involves purposeful deceit. This is an interesting psychological perspective on guilt that you could examine further. 


In The Hound of the Baskervilles, Holmes and Watson suspect Barrymore, Baskerville's butler, as he has a beard and a bearded man was seen following Sir Henry Baskerville. However, the true culprit and the killer of Sir Charles Baskerville turns out to be Jack Stapleton. Again, as in The Moonstone, appearances are deceptive, as Stapleton appears to be a harmless scientist. He is actually a descendant of Hugo Baskerville, the evil Baskerville. Therefore, Doyle implies that Stapleton's evil is inherited and that there is a biological component to guilt. This would also be an interesting angle to examine. 

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Explain and discuss how the definitions of freedom change for the nation, for the freedmen and for southern whites after the Civil War.

After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to... After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to belong to without being ordered to attend religious services (or not to attend) by their mast...
Post a Comment
Read more