Skip to main content

What idea does Tim O'Brien develop in "On the Rainy River"?

The primary idea that O'Brien presents is the notion and the nature of shame, guilt, and responsibility. In 1968, the main character in this story, Tim O'Brien, (intentionally the same as the author, although it's not autobiographical), has been drafted into the Army, and he struggles to decide whether he should serve in Vietnam or flee to Canada. 


In the chapter, O'Brien describes himself as "politically naive," yet he knows a great deal more about...

The primary idea that O'Brien presents is the notion and the nature of shame, guilt, and responsibility. In 1968, the main character in this story, Tim O'Brien, (intentionally the same as the author, although it's not autobiographical), has been drafted into the Army, and he struggles to decide whether he should serve in Vietnam or flee to Canada. 


In the chapter, O'Brien describes himself as "politically naive," yet he knows a great deal more about the history and background of Vietnam than the ignorant and jingoistic "polyestered Kiwanis boys... and the fine upstanding gentry out at the country club" do.  O'Brien feels the guilt that would accompany his desertion, envisioning "[his] father's eyes" if he told him he was running, yet he justifiably sees himself as being "too good for this war."


O'Brien does run for a while. Holed up at Elroy Berdahl's fishing camp on the Rainy River that divides the U.S. and Canada, O'Brien spends a tortuous week on the horns of his dilemma. Berdahl refrains from commenting or advising him, even though he obviously knows why O'Brien is there. They coexist in a "ferocious silence," as O'Brien agonizes over what to do.  Ultimately, Berdahl takes him out in his boat, positioning it "twenty yards" from Canada, where O'Brien can clearly see the shore. It's a powerful and symbolic setting, and it is there that O'Brien ultimately decides to submit, to be a "coward" and not "swim away from [his] hometown and [his] country and [his] life," and instead to go to war, simply because "[he] was embarrassed not to."


Here lies the central question of the story: Which is more courageous—to go fight in a war you don't believe in and possibly die, or to follow your own convictions in the face of humiliation and exile? 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more