Skip to main content

What is a summary of chapter 6 of Outliers?

Chapter 6 of “Outliers,” titled “Harlan, Kentucky,” is divided into four numbered parts. As he does throughout the book, Gladwell first presents a story, and then he follows it up with relevant explanatory research.


Part 1. Harlan County is located in the southeastern corner of Kentucky, in the part of the Appalachian Mountains called the Cumberland Plateau. The town’s two founding families, the Howards and the Turners, did not get along. They had a long-standing...

Chapter 6 of “Outliers,” titled “Harlan, Kentucky,” is divided into four numbered parts. As he does throughout the book, Gladwell first presents a story, and then he follows it up with relevant explanatory research.


Part 1. Harlan County is located in the southeastern corner of Kentucky, in the part of the Appalachian Mountains called the Cumberland Plateau. The town’s two founding families, the Howards and the Turners, did not get along. They had a long-standing family feud that resulted in multiple killings over the years, on both sides. “There were places in nineteenth-century America where people lived in harmony,” Gladwell writes. “Harlan, Kentucky, was not one of them.”


Part 2. The most famous family feud in the larger region of Appalachia was the one between the Hatfields and the McCoys on the West Virginia-Kentucky border, not far from Harlan. But many more can be documented, including the Howard-Turner feud. Gladwell says, “When one family fights with another, it’s a feud. When lots of families fight with one another … it’s a pattern.” Sociologists believe this pattern is caused by the continuance of the “culture of honor” that the Scotch-Irish immigrants had brought to this mountain region. People in this borderland felt they had an innate duty to protect their territories, reputations, and families; and that it was honorable to run off or kill anyone who threatened any of them. In this way, we can see that our “cultural legacies” can influence behavior for generations.


Part 3.  In the early 1990s, two psychologists (Cohen and Nisbett) at the University of Michigan conducted an experiment where young men had to complete a questionnaire. And as they left the testing area, they ran into someone difficult who was in the way and who called them a casual but offensive name. Some of the men let the insult just slide away. Others were immediately quick to anger and were ready for a bigger confrontation. The researchers found that what made the difference in their reactions was where each man was from. The men from the northern part of the United States laughed off the encounter. The men from the south were “itching for a fight.”


Part 4. The Michigan study addresses the power of the cultural legacy. The southern men in the study were not from the mountain region, and they were hundreds of miles from home. They were college students and had no reason to feel challenged over properties or families. “And yet none of that mattered. They still acted like they were living in nineteenth-century Harlan, Kentucky.” Gladwell wonders if such information about the importance of our cultural legacies can be useful in determining whether or not a person will be successful in life. He explores this theme in the chapters that follow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are the cobra's physical features in Rikki-Tikki-Tavi?

There are two cobras that Rikki-tikki faces off against.  Nag is the male cobra and Nagaina is the female cobra.  The first snake that Rikki-tikki sees is Nag, and he is a rather imposing figure. Then inch by inch out of the grass rose up the head and spread hood of Nag, the big black cobra, and he was five feet long from tongue to tail. … he looked at Rikki-tikki with the wicked snake's eyes that never change their expression, whatever the snake may be thinking of. Nag raises himself up and shows off his great hood.  On his hood there is a “spectacle-mark on the back of it that looks exactly like the eye part of a hook-and-eye fastening.”  Rikki-tikki is only intimidated for a moment, and is not tricked when Nagaina tries to come up behind him. Nag and Nagaina know that a mongoose is very bad news for them.  As the new house mongoose, it is Rikki-tikki’s job to kill all of the snakes.  The cobras would definitely be on his hit-list, and this worries them because they have a family...

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...