Skip to main content

What is a summary of chapter 6 of Outliers?

Chapter 6 of “Outliers,” titled “Harlan, Kentucky,” is divided into four numbered parts. As he does throughout the book, Gladwell first presents a story, and then he follows it up with relevant explanatory research.


Part 1. Harlan County is located in the southeastern corner of Kentucky, in the part of the Appalachian Mountains called the Cumberland Plateau. The town’s two founding families, the Howards and the Turners, did not get along. They had a long-standing...

Chapter 6 of “Outliers,” titled “Harlan, Kentucky,” is divided into four numbered parts. As he does throughout the book, Gladwell first presents a story, and then he follows it up with relevant explanatory research.


Part 1. Harlan County is located in the southeastern corner of Kentucky, in the part of the Appalachian Mountains called the Cumberland Plateau. The town’s two founding families, the Howards and the Turners, did not get along. They had a long-standing family feud that resulted in multiple killings over the years, on both sides. “There were places in nineteenth-century America where people lived in harmony,” Gladwell writes. “Harlan, Kentucky, was not one of them.”


Part 2. The most famous family feud in the larger region of Appalachia was the one between the Hatfields and the McCoys on the West Virginia-Kentucky border, not far from Harlan. But many more can be documented, including the Howard-Turner feud. Gladwell says, “When one family fights with another, it’s a feud. When lots of families fight with one another … it’s a pattern.” Sociologists believe this pattern is caused by the continuance of the “culture of honor” that the Scotch-Irish immigrants had brought to this mountain region. People in this borderland felt they had an innate duty to protect their territories, reputations, and families; and that it was honorable to run off or kill anyone who threatened any of them. In this way, we can see that our “cultural legacies” can influence behavior for generations.


Part 3.  In the early 1990s, two psychologists (Cohen and Nisbett) at the University of Michigan conducted an experiment where young men had to complete a questionnaire. And as they left the testing area, they ran into someone difficult who was in the way and who called them a casual but offensive name. Some of the men let the insult just slide away. Others were immediately quick to anger and were ready for a bigger confrontation. The researchers found that what made the difference in their reactions was where each man was from. The men from the northern part of the United States laughed off the encounter. The men from the south were “itching for a fight.”


Part 4. The Michigan study addresses the power of the cultural legacy. The southern men in the study were not from the mountain region, and they were hundreds of miles from home. They were college students and had no reason to feel challenged over properties or families. “And yet none of that mattered. They still acted like they were living in nineteenth-century Harlan, Kentucky.” Gladwell wonders if such information about the importance of our cultural legacies can be useful in determining whether or not a person will be successful in life. He explores this theme in the chapters that follow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...