Skip to main content

What would life would have been like for a slave?

Life for a slave during this era would have varied widely depending on the individual slave’s circumstances.  We have to remember that, while slavery was a horrible and evil institution, not all slaves experienced it in exactly the same way.  The slaves were individual people with different experiences.


In one sense, we can say that life would have been terrible for all slaves.  Every slave would have lived their entire life knowing that they were...

Life for a slave during this era would have varied widely depending on the individual slave’s circumstances.  We have to remember that, while slavery was a horrible and evil institution, not all slaves experienced it in exactly the same way.  The slaves were individual people with different experiences.


In one sense, we can say that life would have been terrible for all slaves.  Every slave would have lived their entire life knowing that they were not free.  Every slave would have known that, at any moment, they could be beaten at the whim of another.  Every slave would have known that their owner could sell them or their family or friends and they would never see one another again.  Every female slave would have known that she could be sexually abused with impunity.  Even if these things never did happen to a given slave, each slave would have known that they could happen and therefore each slave would have lived life feeling very insecure and feeling that they had not control over their lives.


However, different slaves would also have had different experiences.  To some degree, this was because different slaves had different jobs and different owners.  A field slave would have to engage in hard physical labor all day, but would have spent most of his or her time among other slaves.  By contrast, a slave who worked more as a domestic servant would not have had to work as hard, but that slave would have spent every day mostly in the company of the white people they were serving.  These would have been very different lives.  A slave might have had a particularly brutal owner.  If so, that slave would have had a very different life than a slave whose owner was relatively kind.  A female slave whose owner (or owner’s son, or nephew, or whatever) found her physically attractive would have had a very different experience than one who was not subject to sexual abuse.


In addition, we have to remember that the slaves were individual people with different personalities.  We should not think of them as one monolithic group because, in a sense, that denies their humanity.  Different slaves would also have experienced life differently because they would have had different personalities.  One slave might have had a very aggressive and hot-headed personality.  That slave would have probably gotten in a lot of trouble with authority and would have been beaten a lot.  A second slave might have had a personality that wished to avoid conflict. That slave might have had a life that seemed easier.  (Of course, the first slave might have had more peace of mind, at least knowing that he or she was resisting while the second slave might have felt that they should have been more defiant.)  Since people are different and slaves were people, the slaves would have had very different personalities and, therefore, different experiences of life in slavery.


Life as a slave would have generally been a life of hard work and few material comforts.  It would have been a life of uncertainty and lack of control.  Beyond that, however, life for different slaves would have been very different depending on the slaves’ individual circumstances and personalities.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more