Skip to main content

Does Brutus have power in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar?

Brutus does possess power in Shakespeare's play, the power that political influence wields; however, he loses this power because of his ineffective idealism.


Brutus is considered a very influential senator, and for this reason Cassius "courts" him in order to gain his support in the plot to assassinate Julius Caesar. For, in gaining the support of Brutus, Cassius knows that others joining in the conspiracy will then follow through with action. Inflamed by idealism, Brutus...

Brutus does possess power in Shakespeare's play, the power that political influence wields; however, he loses this power because of his ineffective idealism.


Brutus is considered a very influential senator, and for this reason Cassius "courts" him in order to gain his support in the plot to assassinate Julius Caesar. For, in gaining the support of Brutus, Cassius knows that others joining in the conspiracy will then follow through with action. Inflamed by idealism, Brutus is convinced by Cassius that Caesar will become tyrannical if given the single rule of Rome, so he joins the conspiracy to assassinate Caesar, providing the murder plot's needed influence and impetus to action.


Having thus joined with the others, Brutus strikes the final stab into Julius Caesar on the Ides of March. Brutus's idealism is not in harmony with the raw rules of life, rules Cassius understands and about which he tries to convince Brutus. Brutus, then, becomes flawed in his assessment of human nature and its motivations. His flawed judgment is evinced in his address to the plebeians. While Brutus initially elicits their support as they shout "Live, Brutus! Live, live!" after he explains that he killed Caesar, not because he did not love him, but because he loved Rome more— 



Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men? (III.2.21-22)



Nevertheless, the crowd is swayed soon after when Brutus permits Marc Antony to speak. At first, Antony walks onto the pulpit, carrying the bloody body of Julius Caesar, and Brutus offers to slay himself if the crowd demands it. Instead, the crowd continues to shout "Live, Brutus!"


It is not long before Antony creates doubt in the minds of the plebeians that Brutus and the others may not be honorable, but are instead the ones who are ambitious, not Caesar. His presentation of Caesar's mangled and bloody body informs the crowd of a vicious assault, one more demonstrative of hatred and self-interest. The plebeians assume these wounds were inflicted by exigent men, not noble idealists. Brutus has been lying, these wounds seem to indicate. Thus, Antony makes of Caesar a martyr, not a tyrant.


Brutus's tragic flaw is his misunderstanding of the base nature of man, which leads to his loss of influence and the increased power of the more pragmatic Marc Antony and demise of Cassius and Brutus.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more

What gift did Della buy for Jim and why in "The Gift of the Magi" by O. Henry?

Della buys Jim a watch fob because his watch is his most prized possession. Della and Jim Young do not have much money. Despite this, Della really wants to buy Jim a good Christmas present. She is even willing to sell her hair to get him a nice gift. This is ironic because we learn Della and Jim both highly prize her hair. Now, there were two possessions of the James Dillingham Youngs in which... Della buys Jim a watch fob because his watch is his most prized possession. Della and Jim Young do not have much money. Despite this, Della really wants to buy Jim a good Christmas present. She is even willing to sell her hair to get him a nice gift. This is ironic because we learn Della and Jim both highly prize her hair. Now, there were two possessions of the James Dillingham Youngs in which they both took a mighty pride. One was Jim's gold watch that had been his father's and his grandfather's. The other was Della's hair.  Della is still willing to sell her hair so she can b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Explain and discuss how the definitions of freedom change for the nation, for the freedmen and for southern whites after the Civil War.

After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to... After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to belong to without being ordered to attend religious services (or not to attend) by their mast...
Post a Comment
Read more