Skip to main content

What makes our government a democracy?

In order to understand what makes our government democratic, let us look at what characteristics a democracy has.


The first characteristic of a democracy is that it has to have popular sovereignty.  That is, the people have to have the ultimate power in the government. Our government has this because we have competitive elections for positions of real power. We participate in real elections to select people for offices like the president.  The government does...

In order to understand what makes our government democratic, let us look at what characteristics a democracy has.


The first characteristic of a democracy is that it has to have popular sovereignty.  That is, the people have to have the ultimate power in the government. Our government has this because we have competitive elections for positions of real power. We participate in real elections to select people for offices like the president.  The government does not control who gets to run in the elections, allowing candidates like Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders to run even though their beliefs do not fit entirely into the platform of the Republican or Democrat parties.  Once we elect people, they have real power.  The members of Congress that we elect go and actually make laws that govern us. We are not just electing a sham government that has no real power.  We have popular sovereignty, which is one characteristic of democracy.


A second aspect of democracy is political equality. In a true democracy, everyone must potentially have the same amount of say in government. In our government, everyone has the same ability to vote.  No one's vote counts for more than anyone else’s.  Everyone has the same right to run for office once he or she reaches the age specified in the Constitution. In this way, we have political liberty, which helps make us a democracy.


Another characteristic of democracy is that people have political liberty, meaning people have the right to express themselves on political issues. In the United States, we have this because people can say or write whatever they want about political issues. People are free to criticize the government and individual political leaders as harshly as they want. This shows that we have political liberty, which is another aspect of democracy.


In addition to political liberty, people in a democracy must also have personal liberty.  The people have to be able to do more or less whatever they want in their personal lives.  In the United States, we have this type of liberty.  The government cannot tell us what race of person we may or may not marry.  It cannot tell us where we may or may not live. It does not tell us what religion we may or may not belong to.  In these ways, the government respects our personal liberties.


Because our government meets all of these criteria, we have a democracy.  It is true the United States government is not perfect in all of these areas; however, it is still a democracy because it generally meets the criteria listed above.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more