Skip to main content

Who was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court that disagreed with Thomas Jefferson about many political issues?

The Chief Justice referred to in this question was John Marshall. Marshall was a Federalist, who believed in strengthening the powers of the federal government relative to the states. Jefferson, a Republican, believed in the opposite. Many of Marshall's decisions played a major role in consolidating the powers of the federal government. McCulloch v. Maryland(1819) ruled that Congress had the power, due to the Necessary and Proper Clause, to establish a national bank and...

The Chief Justice referred to in this question was John Marshall. Marshall was a Federalist, who believed in strengthening the powers of the federal government relative to the states. Jefferson, a Republican, believed in the opposite. Many of Marshall's decisions played a major role in consolidating the powers of the federal government. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) ruled that Congress had the power, due to the Necessary and Proper Clause, to establish a national bank and that the Supremacy Clause prevented the states from taxing it. This decision was anathema to both the strict constructionist and states' rights views held by many of Jefferson's political allies (and to some extent by Jefferson himself.) In many other decisions, like Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodard, Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, and Cohens v. Virginia, the Marshall Court continued to rule in ways that strengthened the national government. Ironically, the most famous decision associated with the Marshall Court, Marbury v. Madison (1803,) which established the principle of judicial review of Congressional laws, was a decision in favor of Jefferson, whose Secretary of State, James Madison, was the defendant in the case. Also, Marshall, who nurtured an intense personal dislike for Jefferson, was actually his cousin. Both men were part of the Virginia planter elite that dominated American politics for much of the early republic period.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more