Skip to main content

How would one describe his or her response to the paragraph in Elie Wiesel's Night about the character of "Moshe the Beadle"? What was Wiesel...

The significance of the opening paragraph of Elie Wiesel's Night only becomes apparent later in the chapter. By beginning his narrative with a brief description of a nondescript figure, Wiesel is preparing the reader for the full measure of Moshe the Beadle's importance as the story develops.

The paragraph in question describes a seemingly innocuous figure in the small town in which Elie's family lives. Poor and idiosyncratic, Moshe is also among the more religiously observant in this town, and he would be an object of ridicule were he not so clearly harmless, pious and committed to his temple, or house of worship. While the paragraph that opens Chapter One, and that is the subject of the student's question, introduces the reader to Moshe the Beadle, it is the following paragraph that truly serves to emphasize this character's benign and optimistic nature:



"Physically, he was as awkward as a clown. His waiflike shyness made people smile. As for me, I liked his wide, dreamy eyes, gazing off into the distance. He spoke little. He sang, or rather he chanted, and the few snatches I caught here and there spoke of divine suffering, of the Shekhinah in Exile, where, according to Kabbalah, it awaits its redemption linked to that of man."



Wiesel introduces the character of Moshe the Beadle right at the outset because it is Moshe the Beadle who will be among the first from Elie's village to bear witness to the horrors that will befall all of the town's Jews. More importantly, it is Moshe who will represent God's failure to protect His people. Moshe speaks of God reverently and as an omniscient presence. When the Jewish population are forcibly evicted from their homes and placed in concentration camps, condemned to die of starvation, disease, or execution at the hands of German soldiers, Moshe's early commitment to God rings, to the young Elie, hollow. Very quickly, within the book's opening passages, Moshe's significance changes, and, with it, Elie's perceptions of God. Early on, Elie emphasizes Moshe's importance to his own spiritual journey: "I became convinced that Moshe the Beadle would help me enter eternity, into that time when question and answer would become ONE." After Moshe and other Jews are deported, with Moshe surviving the mass execution of the others, the change in this character is palpable:



"Moshe was not the same. The joy in his eyes was gone. He no longer sang. He no longer mentioned either God or Kabbalah. He spoke only of what he had seen."



Moshe the Beadle represents not only Elie's profound disappointment in God—a disillusionment that will only grow as his own situation worsens—but the failure of Europe's Jews to accurately perceive the extent of the danger to their existence. Contrast the "Moshe the Beadle" of that opening paragraph with the one described in this latter quote. The fate of Moshe the Beadle represents the fate of Elie's own spiritual journey.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more