Skip to main content

What are the main similarities of Dickinson and Whitman?

At first glance, you would think there would not be many: Dickinson wrote comparatively tiny poems that fiercely articulated a turbulent internal life; her intended audience, if there was one beside herself, was surely very small. Whitman's work, on the other hand, is epic in scope, expansive in theme, and all-encompassing in the audience he hoped to reach. Dickinson was all but unknown in her life; Whitman, on the other hand, courted a kind of...

At first glance, you would think there would not be many: Dickinson wrote comparatively tiny poems that fiercely articulated a turbulent internal life; her intended audience, if there was one beside herself, was surely very small. Whitman's work, on the other hand, is epic in scope, expansive in theme, and all-encompassing in the audience he hoped to reach. Dickinson was all but unknown in her life; Whitman, on the other hand, courted a kind of celebrity, styling himself the “good gray poet.” Dickinson knew about Whitman, but (as far as we know) never read him – she did not approve of his subject matter.


One of the great “what ifs” in literary history is what would have happened if these two had read each other, because for all their differences they are linked by influence, subject matter, and their formal approach to meter.


  • Dickinson and Whitman both came to define a new and distinctly American poetic voice--one that was decidedly personal, and that celebrated the individual.

  • Both poets deal with many of the same themes, such as the individual’s relationship to nature, death, love, or the idea of personal freedom (although their takes on these ideas can be quite different).

  • Both poets embraced free verse and wrote poems that were formally unlike almost all other contemporary verse – think about Whitman’s excessive line length, or Dickinson’s penchant for eccentric punctuation or lines that seem to stop in the middle of a thought.

It’s easy (and fun) to generalize (as I am) about how these two compare. But the fun really starts when you start looking at the poems. Dickinson’s famous poem about death,



Because I could not stop for Death –
He kindly stopped for me –
The Carriage held but just Ourselves –
And Immortality



(Read the whole poem here. It's quite short.)


can be contrasted with Whitman’s famous lines about death from "Song of Myself": 



What do you think has become of the young and old men?
And what do you think has become of the women and children?

They are alive and well somewhere,
The smallest sprout shows there is really no death,
And if ever there was it led forward life, and does not wait at the end to arrest it,
And ceas'd the moment life appear'd.


All goes onward and outward, nothing collapses,
And to die is different from what any one supposed, and luckier.



It’s easy to see the differences in poetic practice here – Dickinson is focused inward, while Whitman is addressing his reader directly; Whitman is openly optimistic, while Dickinson is pensive. But both share a confounding (and expansive) view of their own mortality – a sense that, through poetic expression, that are somehow able to get outside of their selves, and outside of mortality itself; for both, their perspective is – for lack of a better word – other-worldly. I think in the end, Dickinson would agree with Whitman’s comment about how “lucky” it is to die.

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How did the United States become an imperial power?

"Imperial power" is a bit of a vague label. It tends to mean several things at once, so let's unpack it. In the sense of "this country was built on conquest by force," the "imperial power" part of America actually predates the United States proper. The territories that would become the United States were imperial colonies, established by the great European empires of the 17th and 18th centuries. Much of the US Constitution and American governance generally goes back to England, history's largest and most successful imperial power, but vital aspects of American culture come from other imperial powers, such as France and Spain. Much of American culture comes from sources other than the old empires, but they were key influences on what the United States became. In the sense of "this country treats conquest by force as a fundamental component of its culture, economy and politics," the United States has always been an imperial power. Even earl...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more