Skip to main content

Did Henrik Ibsen say whether A Doll's House is a feminist play?

It is said that, when asked, Henrik Ibsen denied that A Doll's House was a feminist play; instead, he asserted it was a humanist play. Humanism, a social movement developed during the Renaissance, thought it necessary to re-introduce ancient Greek and Roman culture and philosophies into civilization. Humanists promoted a return to studying ancient Greek and Roman texts, and from these texts, they developed philosophies that endorsed fully participating in life, appreciating...

It is said that, when asked, Henrik Ibsen denied that A Doll's House was a feminist play; instead, he asserted it was a humanist play.

Humanism, a social movement developed during the Renaissance, thought it necessary to re-introduce ancient Greek and Roman culture and philosophies into civilization. Humanists promoted a return to studying ancient Greek and Roman texts, and from these texts, they developed philosophies that endorsed fully participating in life, appreciating life's luxuries and beauties, and engaging in "rich and varied human relationships" ("Renaissance Humanism," The History Guide). Humanists especially endorsed individualism through promoting the pursuit of individual liberties, and rejected any form of oppression, especially the oppression that is a direct result of social class systems ("Renaissance Humanism").

Ibsen saw his play, as well as his works in general, as humanist rather than feminist because his themes did not pertain just to women. While the two lead female characters are certainly oppressed, even male characters, like Krogstad, deal with social injustice. Krogstad, similarly to Nora, once committed a fraud to save his wife's life, just as Nora forged her father's signature on a loan to save her husband's life. As a result of Krogstad's "indiscretion," society treated him as an outcast, forcing him to earn a living in any way he can to provide for his sons. As Krogstad says to Nora in the opening act, "The law cares nothing about motives," which Nora notes is extremely unjust. As a result of unjust law and unjust society, Krogstad has had to fight for years to regain his reputation, which drove him to threaten Nora with blackmail.


Since Ibsen does not distinguish between male and female victims, arguing instead that both sexes are victims of society, his play is really a humanist play promoting the need for individuality and freedom from oppression, not a feminist play.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...
Post a Comment
Read more