Skip to main content

To what extent have Aldous Huxley's Brave New World and George Orwell's 1984 explored the notion of challenging the status quo and questioning...

The idea that we should question and challenge political authority and the status quo is central to both 1984 and Brave New World. The novels envision different types of dystopia, but in each, loss of the power to think, challenge authority or make one's own decisions dehumanizes the population.


In 1984, the dystopia is one in which people live under the heel of a repressive state regime. Here, they live physically miserable lives with...

The idea that we should question and challenge political authority and the status quo is central to both 1984 and Brave New World. The novels envision different types of dystopia, but in each, loss of the power to think, challenge authority or make one's own decisions dehumanizes the population.


In 1984, the dystopia is one in which people live under the heel of a repressive state regime. Here, they live physically miserable lives with poor food, broken elevators, endless shortages of basic goods, continuous warfare and constant surveillance. Any shred of individualism or thinking for oneself is potentially a thought crime. The language is in the process of being dumbed down and reduced to the fewest number of words and concepts so that people won't have any apparatus for developing independent thought. 


In Brave New World, the population lives amid material plenty and without war. Rather than being openly miserable, people are conditioned from earliest youth to be happy with their lot. Yet they also are conditioned never to think for themselves, to live superficially and to avoid entering into deep relationship with another human being. They live in a banal world without real poetry, art, religion or grandeur. The goal is the absence of suffering, but this leads to a loss of humanity and autonomy similar to the loss people experience in 1984. In both cultures, people have been robbed of the ability to develop as individuals or to question their fate.


Brave New World was written before 1984. When 1984 appeared, Huxley wrote Orwell a letter. In it, Huxley naturally defended his own version of dystopia as more likely, writing



Within the next generation I believe that the world's rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience. In other words, I feel that the nightmare of Nineteen Eighty-Four is destined to modulate into the nightmare of a world having more resemblance to that which I imagined in Brave New World.



The letter is relevant because it shows Huxley's awareness that both novels centrally concern governments robbing people of their individualism by forcing them, one way or another, to become obedient instruments of the state. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...