Skip to main content

How do I analyze and criticize a play using a feminist framework?

To conduct a feminist critique of a play, you will want to take a look at the roles and relationships of women in the piece. You may also wish to consider how the "world" is constructed to either reinforce or challenge these roles and relationships.


I'd like to recommend you begin by conducting this rather popular "litmus test" for whether or not a piece of media is oppressive to women-- the Bechdel-Wallace test. This test...

To conduct a feminist critique of a play, you will want to take a look at the roles and relationships of women in the piece. You may also wish to consider how the "world" is constructed to either reinforce or challenge these roles and relationships.


I'd like to recommend you begin by conducting this rather popular "litmus test" for whether or not a piece of media is oppressive to women-- the Bechdel-Wallace test. This test was first designed to evaluate films, but may be adapted for literature and theater works. In order to "pass" the test, your chosen play must meet three criteria.


  • There must be at least two named women characters.

  • They must talk to each other.

  • They must talk about something other than a man.

Though it  has received some criticism, this simple test is an excellent way to discern the nature of women characters in a piece of media. If your chosen play passes the test, one can infer that these women characters are likely offered some kind of story-line and personal agency that is not entirely in support of and subservient to the roles of the male characters.


In addition to the Bechdel-Wallace test, consider the following questions:


  • When was the play written? What is the setting? What were the gender norms in these times?

  • What roles are the characters depicted in? Consider the roles of both men and women. Do women exist as characters only in relation to others-- the mother, daughter, sister, wife, aunt, or nursemaid relations? Or are they described as having lives outside of their (largely familial) relationships?

  • How are gender roles (or the constructs of masculinity and femininity) defined? Is there any challenge or subversion of this in the play? How does this affect the attitudes of characters?

  • Has anyone else performed a feminist literary analysis of this play? What did they have to say?

I've also shared some helpful links below which offer more detail and some resources for creating your feminist critique. This sounds like a really interesting project and I hope you have a great time with it!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are the cobra's physical features in Rikki-Tikki-Tavi?

There are two cobras that Rikki-tikki faces off against.  Nag is the male cobra and Nagaina is the female cobra.  The first snake that Rikki-tikki sees is Nag, and he is a rather imposing figure. Then inch by inch out of the grass rose up the head and spread hood of Nag, the big black cobra, and he was five feet long from tongue to tail. … he looked at Rikki-tikki with the wicked snake's eyes that never change their expression, whatever the snake may be thinking of. Nag raises himself up and shows off his great hood.  On his hood there is a “spectacle-mark on the back of it that looks exactly like the eye part of a hook-and-eye fastening.”  Rikki-tikki is only intimidated for a moment, and is not tricked when Nagaina tries to come up behind him. Nag and Nagaina know that a mongoose is very bad news for them.  As the new house mongoose, it is Rikki-tikki’s job to kill all of the snakes.  The cobras would definitely be on his hit-list, and this worries them because they have a family...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more