Skip to main content

In To Kill a Mockingbird, what is the difference between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law?

A great example of the difference between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law can be seen in chapter 30 after Boo Radley saves the Finch children from Bob Ewell's attack on their lives. Atticus is a proponent of upholding the law even if it means that his son has to take responsibility for killing Bob Ewell in self-defense. Heck Tate tells him that it wasn't Jem who killed Ewell, but Boo Radley. As sheriff, Tate represents law enforcement, so what he determines in the case can be analyzed by the state. If anyone is to be held responsible for Ewell's death, which would be based on self-defense, it would all be determined from Tate's report. Tate tells Atticus the following about his decision:


"To my way of thinkin', Mr. Finch, taking the one man who's done you and this town a great service an' draggin' him with his shy ways into the limelight--to me, that's a sin. It's a sin and I'm not about to have it on my head. If it was any other man it'd be different. But not this man, Mr. Finch" (276).



Heck Tate is basically saying that the spirit of the law overrides the letter of the law when it comes to Boo Radley. He's making the point that it is better to honor Boo for his good deed by allowing him to keep his right to privacy over reporting everything to the police, town, and state. Tate also seems to allude to the title and theme of the book as stated by Atticus in chapter 10:



"Shoot all the bluejays you want, if you can hit 'em, but remember it's a sin to kill a mockingbird" (90).



This seems to be the spiritual law discussed in the book. It's a sin to hurt people who are less-fortunate, or who have fewer privileges or opportunities based on race or social ability. Atticus realizes that Tate's decision is better for Boo Radley, who is like an innocent mockingbird, and tells Scout to support it as well.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

In Martel's Life of Pi, how does writing a diary help Pi Patel build on his leadership skills?

At the end of chapter 73, Pi first divulges the fact that he had started a diary after about a week alone at sea. Pi claims that he wrote about "practical stuff" (208) such as what he caught for food, foreseeable problems and solutions, Richard Parker, and reflections about specific events that occurred. In a sense, Pi is the captain of his ship; therefore, he must take responsibility for himself and his crew. He can... At the end of chapter 73, Pi first divulges the fact that he had started a diary after about a week alone at sea. Pi claims that he wrote about "practical stuff" (208) such as what he caught for food, foreseeable problems and solutions, Richard Parker, and reflections about specific events that occurred. In a sense, Pi is the captain of his ship; therefore, he must take responsibility for himself and his crew. He can do this by writing down events, problems and solutions, and reflections to look back on when confronted with repeated problems. It can ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why did Tybalt attack and kill Mercutio instead of Romeo, who he had originally been targeting?

Though Tybalt's quarrel is with Romeo, he begins the momentous duel in Act 3 by fighting with and killing Mercutio instead. Tybalt ultimately attacks Mercutio because the garrulous and hot-headed character insults Tybalt and goads him into a duel to protect Romeo's honor. From the beginning of the encounter in Act 3, Scene 1, it's clear that Mercutio is itching for a fight. For instance, when Tybalt signals that he wants to talk to Mercutio... Though Tybalt's quarrel is with Romeo, he begins the momentous duel in Act 3 by fighting with and killing Mercutio instead. Tybalt ultimately attacks Mercutio because the garrulous and hot-headed character insults Tybalt and goads him into a duel to protect Romeo's honor. From the beginning of the encounter in Act 3, Scene 1, it's clear that Mercutio is itching for a fight. For instance, when Tybalt signals that he wants to talk to Mercutio and Benvolio, Mercutio responds "And but one word with one of us?/ Couple it w...
Post a Comment
Read more